How we get clients, how we sell them, and what we actually deliver. Read it end to end, then give me your notes on the questions at the bottom.
No pricing in this document by design. Tier names are fine to use in conversation, numbers are not.
This is not five products. It is one sales conversation with five landing places.
Everything we sell is the same story: businesses lose money in the gap between generating a lead and closing it, and we find that gap and fix it. What changes between tiers is who does the work, not what the work is.
That matters for you because it means you are not learning five things. You are learning one system, and then learning which version of it a given person is being sold.
| Tier | Who it is for | Who does the work |
|---|---|---|
| The Lead Leak Audit Free |
Anyone. This is the front door and the only thing cold traffic ever sees. | They do. It is a self-serve tool that gives them a number. |
| The Leak Report Paid diagnostic |
Someone spending real money who wants the true picture, not an estimate. | We do the analysis. They fix it, or they hire us to. |
| LeadLock Subscription |
Businesses running Meta lead forms with no proper follow up. Narrow problem, narrow fix. | We install and run the capture and follow up layer only. Never their ads. |
| The 30-Day Pipeline Done with you |
People who want the whole system but want to own and run it themselves. | They build it. We teach, review and unblock. |
| The Decision Maker Pipeline Done for you |
Businesses with a real sales function who want it built and run for them. | We do all of it. This is the retainer. |
The rule that makes it work: a no at any tier falls to the tier below rather than ending the conversation. Nobody leaves a call with nothing, and nobody gets sold something they cannot afford to succeed at.
How a stranger becomes a booked call.
The whole point of the fork is that it happens before anyone reaches a calendar.
We ran a version of this in May. The traffic was the best we had produced all year. People clicked, people filled it in, seven prospects booked calls.
Every single one of them was too small to afford what we were selling. The money was spent, the calls were held, and nothing closed.
The traffic was never the problem. We were letting anyone book. So now two of the six questions quietly sort people by size, and only the ones who can actually buy reach a calendar. Everyone else still gets real value, just self-serve.
What this means for anything you write or brief: our ads run broad with no interest targeting, so the copy has to do the targeting. Every hook must name the audience out loud in the first line. "If you run a distribution business in Malta" does more work than any targeting setting.
Meta ads, broad, pointed only at the free audit. Predictable, costs money, scales the moment it works.
Referrals, now with a formal programme behind them. Cheapest and highest converting. Asked for at two fixed moments, never randomly.
Stephen's LinkedIn and long form. Slow to start, compounds, and warms people up before they ever see an ad.
What happens on the call, and why the order matters.
Top down, never bottom up. Starting high makes everything underneath feel reasonable. Starting low means the top never gets heard.
We went back through every sales call and sorted why each one did not close.
Money and partner together account for more than half. Both are fixable before the call rather than during it.
Money is fixed by the fork in the audit. Partner is fixed by asking, at booking, who else needs to be on the call, and rescheduling rather than running it without them.
Twenty six calls where we sat in an empty room. That is the cheapest thing on this list to fix and we were not doing it.
This is now part of every sales conversation, not an afterthought. Ten percent of what we collect, for twelve months, on anyone they send us.
It gets asked at exactly two moments and never at others: at the close, while they are still enthusiastic about the decision, and at the first real win, when we have proof they can point at. Asking at any other time feels like begging.
The mechanism is the same at every tier. Only the hands change.
This diagram is the product. Everything we sell is a different way of closing these five gaps.
Done for you, we run all three. Done with you, they run all three and we review. The order never changes: never buy traffic for something that is not built.
Every client ends up with six numbers visible: cost per qualified enquiry, average response time by person, contact attempts per enquiry, show rate, what happened to every maybe, and which stage moved when a month went badly.
Without those, nobody in their business can be held to anything, and every review meeting becomes opinion against opinion. With them, that stops. Including for us. They can hold us to the same board, and that is deliberate.
One boundary worth stating plainly: at the done-with-you tier we hand over the keys and teach. We do not log in and do it for them. The moment we do it for one member we are doing it for all of them, and the tier stops working for everyone including us.
Six questions. Answer whatever you have a view on, skip the rest. Disagreement is more useful to me than agreement.
We now turn away people who are too small before they ever reach a call. It fixes what went wrong in May, but we will lose some who would have grown into it. Is that trade right?
If a prospect asked you the difference between the done-with-you and the done-for-you tiers, could you answer it in one sentence without looking anything up? If not, tell me where it blurs.
You know the delivery load better than I do. If we sign four new clients in a month, what is the first thing that falls over?
The scripts name the audience out loud because our ads run broad. Is that enough direction, or do you need something more specific to work with?
Six numbers per client, kept current. Is that maintainable alongside everything else, or does it need to be four?
The genuinely open question. You see things in the day to day that do not reach me.
Internal document. Not for clients. Tier names are fine to say out loud, numbers are not.
Prepared 4 August 2026 · The Growth Bully Ltd